Disputes involving artificial intelligence are reaching Michigan courts, and judges are adapting. This video looks at how AI is changing litigation and what business leaders and general counsel should watch.
What this video covers
- AI disputes over data use, algorithmic bias, deepfakes, trade secrets, and contract breaches
- Authenticating AI-generated evidence under Michigan Rule of Evidence 901
- The Michigan Judicial Council’s 2024 report on generative AI
- Expectations for checking citations and disclosing AI use in court filings
- New Michigan laws aimed at deepfakes
How are Michigan courts handling AI disputes?
The companion article explains that AI-generated evidence, whether a chatbot transcript, a model audit, or a deepfake, must be properly authenticated, which can involve witness testimony, metadata, chain of custody, and technical analysis. Discovery of prompts, training data, and logs has also become central. The Eastern District of Michigan is exploring local AI rules, in line with a national trend requiring attorneys to check citations, protect confidentiality, and be open about AI use in filings.
For businesses, the article suggests vetting AI vendors, documenting how models are used, and keeping records that show reasonable care. It concludes that companies with strong authentication practices, transparent systems, and thorough records are in a better position when an AI dispute reaches court.
Read the full article: AI: A New Digital Frontier in Michigan’s Courtrooms
If your business is facing a dispute involving AI, data, or technology contracts, contact Tishkoff PLC through our contact page or call 734.663.4077.
This video and page are for general informational purposes and do not constitute legal advice. Watching the video or reading this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should consult counsel for advice on your specific circumstances.